Wednesday, November 21, 2007

The Convergence

What in the world is a person thinking to double major in Theatre and Religious Studies while participating in a scholarship program like CODA? I hope what I post below will help bring some light to this issue. I am applying to attend seminary in the fall of 2008. As I have told people this during my college time, they reply with one of two responses:

1) Having that theatre background will certainly help you as a preacher.
2) Those are certainly two very different subjects.

I like to believe, though, that neither of these responses is correct. I see a great parallel between the goals of theatre and the purposes of religious ritual. Below I have posted my scholarship essay for Columbia Theological Seminary in Decatur, Georgia. The question I have answered is: What are your convictions about one significant issue facing the church and/or society? How might the church make a faithful response to that issue?

Worship: Community Theatre

American churches have throughout their history been faced with the reality that in order for their communities to flourish, they must “compete” for followers. Religion must be attractive, more attractive than alternative activities in which people could engage. This “free market” religious culture, however, has led to a crisis in the Christian community. Seeking to lure people into our churches, we have sacrificed the language of our faith, devaluing the power and majesty of God and supporting the commercial, consumer culture that surrounds us. I believe that the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) can respond with creativity to reinvigorate the language of faith, and in doing this can reinforce the responsibility and commitment required to be a member of Christ’s church.

The language of the church is vitally important in our practice of Christian worship. How we speak of God and celebrate our relationship with Jesus Christ provide a foundation for our faith. Our culture continues to bombard us with images on television and the internet. We desire enjoyments that come at a click of a button or by dialing the telephone. We continually grow impatient and lackadaisical in our pursuits. If what we need cannot be easily attained, we seek something else. Seeking to meet these ever-changing desires, churches sacrifice theological depth and active worship engagement for a “consumer service” that relies on elements of popular entertainment to keep the attention of the congregation. I believe the reformed heritage of the Presbyterian Church (USA) uniquely prepares us to consider new ways of engaging our congregations in worship and maintaining the language of our faith.

Worship in the Presbyterian tradition has always been central to the life of the church body. Even amidst our modern culture and our technology, I believe that the Presbyterian Church possesses the creativity and the knowledge to maintain the majestic language of worship. There are several ways we can reinvigorate our worship so that the people who enter our churches see a vibrant body, seeking to commune with each other and with God. In his book John Calvin: A Sixteenth Century Portrait, William Bouwsma examines Calvin’s views on worship, and I believe his words speak to our worship today. Calvin believes that worship should involve the whole person. He particularly celebrates King David’s dance before the Ark of the Covenant as an example of the whole person engaging in worship. He states that we should, like David, “exercise ourselves and employ all our senses, and our feet, and our hands, and our arms, and all the rest, so that everything is put in the service of God and magnifies him” (Bouwsma 225).

The worship of our tradition, however, has moved away from Calvin’s original thoughts on the active participation of all people. Our worship tends to be rather stoic compared to Calvin’s view. Call and response prayers, reciting creeds, and hymn-singing are the primary ways in which the whole body of believers engages together. Now Calvin recognized that not all people worship most fully when dancing like David. Not being in the culture of the Hebrew people, we must discover new ways to engage the senses in our worship. When we find ways to utilize touch, taste, and smell as well as seeing and hearing, we can create a community actively engaged throughout the worship process, recognizing their relationships with each other and their need to respond to God’s call.

A more sensory practice of worship participation speaks to the Reformed belief about worship, that God is the audience and we are the performers. Soren Kierkegaard wrote in depth on this subject, talking about God as the “critical theatre-goer who looks on to see how the lines are spoken and how they are listened to.” In this case “the listener ... is the actor, who in all truth acts before God” (Kierkegaard 181). Kierkegaard is correct in his theatrical imagery of worship. He defines the theatrical role of the congregation as active listening before God. In our modern culture, however, many people feel connected when they “do” something. Understanding that God is the audience is not enough for a people of “doers.” We desire ways to express our love, our repentance, our response to God’s word actively in worship.

As a theatre major, I relate well to Kierkegaard’s understanding of the theatre of worship. I believe the metaphor speaks even more deeply. Anyone who studies theatre or participates in it seriously understands how much an actor must prepare before picking up a script. He must have the training and the vocal and physical technique required to engage the text. Once given the text, he breaks it down, discovers his character, and then begins to rehearse with others, always allowing for his role to change and grow. The actor prepares for weeks before presenting his work for an audience. If we believe that worship is a drama presented to God by the congregation and the worship leaders, we must recognize the necessity to prepare the community for the performance.

Recognizing that the bulletin is the “script” for the service, we must take the time outside of worship to study our “text.” We must examine the prayers and the creeds used in the service. We must familiarize ourselves with the hymns and practice them before our performance for God. This can occur through a variety of study classes on worship participation. Active participation of members, though, also requires their aid in crafting the service. We must call on our participants, young and old, to join with our pastors and music leaders to write prayers that come from the people and are read by the people. We must look for ways to engage the biblical text actively in worship that involves more than a “lay reader.” Making worship the responsibility of the community requires that we study the language of our faith and look for new ways to express what we believe about God.

When we engage the body of believers in our worship, everyone sees that he or she has something “at stake” in the worship process. Active engagement also helps us to understand the importance of worship for our daily life of faith. Joining in community to experience the sacred is a rare occasion in our modern culture that celebrates individualism. We need this time of community, and we long to participate actively in it. When we do this, we educate our people in the language of our faith, we place God at the center of our worship and our lives, and we reinforce that we can only be Christians in community, worshiping and serving God together.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Rhodes Radio

Rhodes has a radio station! This initiative started almost two years ago, and was originally going to be a major CODA project. After having run into some very difficult barriers, we had to drop the project from the large agenda the program attempts to carry out. Some dedicated students, however, and the Rhodes Activities Board picked up the pieces and have assembled an online radio station for the college. I've listened to it briefly, and some of the material is pretty good. My belief is that as it gains in popularity, the quality of programming will also continue to improve. Either way, it is certainly exciting that a tiny college like Rhodes can now broadcast things to the world.

The live audio stream is kind of hard to access, so I will try to explain how to do it. Go to www.rhodesradio.org. At the bottom of the screen are posted several different audio players. Click on the play you use most often. Make sure you save the file to your desktop. To access the radio, then, right-click on the file on your desktop and drag your mouse over the "open with" option. Then select your player. When you do this one time, it should save it in your library so that you can continue the stream whenever you wish. Hopefully they can make this process a little easier soon.

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Rocky Horror Success

So Rocky Horror is over. A successful run to say the least. We sold out every performance, bringing in more than 1000 people into the McCoy Theatre. Half of those numbers were students, 504. This data was collected from the ticket stubs from the show, so there is some margin of error in the calculation, but we have a fairly good reason to believe that these are pretty accurate.

So what is it about this show that made it a success? Was Rhodes College yearning to see men in high heels and fishnet hosiery strutting around on stage singing rock n roll music? We discussed this in two meetings I've had over the past three days and have come up with some fairly interesting ideas. Several people mentioned Dylan Hunter's (Frank 'n Furter) legs. While fun, this isn't something we can continually try to utilize in the future as Dylan is a senior this year and can't flash a leg from behind a curtain at every show from now until eternity.

More seriously we discussed the attraction of a large cast, the show being a musical, and the large amount of movement and high energy in the production. I had several people tell me they thought the show was "awesome" but had absolutely no idea what the plot was. From a Rocky Horror standpoint, that's perfection. People coming and having a good time; that's the entire purpose of this kind of show.

A more universal aspect, however, is the pre-show hype that Rocky was blessed with. You could hear people on campus two weeks before opening saying anything from, "Why would they want to do
that show?" to "I'm so excited about Rocky Horror this year; I LOVE the movie!" This resulted in people being turned away at the door on opening night and coming back over and over until they could get in. This pre-show buzz, if it can be replicated, provides a vital element to creating a theatre of "Standing Room Only."

The second, obviously, is that the actual production lives up to the hype. If the show flops, everyone leaves disappointed and tells their friends to stay away. Instead, people told their friends that they "had to see it." There's nothing that a team like ours can do to ensure that the quality of a production will live up to the hype.

But we do have a say about hype. We can find new and creative ways to try to raise awareness of upcoming productions that aren't as "doomed for success" as Rocky was. We must find ways to pique the interest of the campus community so that every show is being discussed days before the first curtain speech is offered. This is our mission, and the success of Rocky Horror has given us reason to be hopeful.